About seven years ago, two of my friends became Pastors of two different churches in our area. Both churches were struggling, having less than 100 people.
One church was made up of seniors, a group of people who some time ago had resisted change, and so had lost their subsequent generations to other churches. The other church had a cross section of families, but was struggling to make a go of it in rented facilities in a relatively small town.
In hindsight, both were uniquely and appropriately gifted, to lead their churches into significant growth.
In the case of the seniors’ church. The church had come to recognize that in order to not be closing the doors in ten years that there had to be some change. Change however would come at a snail’s pace. And the pastor had to have the patience of Job in order to keep persevering with small incremental changes that the seniors could tolerate. He had a true “Pastor’s heart” and spent much time visiting with people and caring for them. The church came to love their Pastor, and the church grew, largely from other churches whose seniors had become disenfranchised and were looking for a place to belong. The Pastor told me that his church had done a very good job of welcoming the new people, going so far as to change the language that was spoken in the seniors group, so that the newcomers would feel more welcome. The church is now twice as large as it was, still mainly seniors, but with more of a hope of a future.
In the other church, the new Pastor was quite a different sort. He was a visionary guy, with all kinds of ideas of how they could present and grow the church. His route was to go very contemporary, while not neglecting the importance of things like baptism and communion. Being contemporary, to him did not mean watering down the word, but presenting it in ways that were understandable and communicated to their target audience. They also put a strong emphasis on small groups, which they called “small church”, knowing that this was one of the best ways to see people discipled and grow. The thing that impressed me the most when visiting, was that they scheduled baptisms for every month, trusting that God would be moving in such a way, that people would want to follow Christ in Baptism. This church has now doubled three times in the seven years that he has been there. Half of the growth has been new convert growth.
What strikes me about both situations is this. Both models work. What is needed is the right Pastor for the right church. I would venture to say that if each of these Pastors had been called to the opposite church, that both of the churches would still be struggling along, if not closed.
One thing that the denomination of my previous church does, is require any church that is calling a new senior Pastor to do a extensive church and community analysis. This is done to help clarify and set their mission, vision, and values. Each potential Pastor undergoes corresponding testing. The church then is presented with a list of Pastors who are appropriate for their situation. The church can recommend that certain names be added, but these potential candidates also have to go through a vetting at the district level. The reason for this of course is to get the right Pastor for the right church, and avoid the sort of church blowups and meltdowns that we here about all too frequently.
I have received permission from the denomination to link to their free resources for those who would like to find out more about the process.