Reflections on the Deity of Christ – Why does it matter?

Mar 19, 2009
Christ on the throne

Christ on the throne

By Michael Bell

This is Part 11, of a multi-part series looking at the deity of Christ. Here are the links to the Introduction and Table of Contents.

Why is it so important that we believe that Jesus is God? Does it make a difference? The answer comes when we look at what it means to have our sins forgiven. This is I believe the most important article in the whole series.

The Forgiveness of Sins

Twice in the Bible Jesus makes the direct claim to forgive sins.

Luke 7:48 (NIV) – Then Jesus said to her, “Your sins are forgiven.”

Mark 2:5-7 (NIV) – “When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven.” Now some of the teachers of the law were sitting there, thinking to themselves, “Why does this fellow talk like that? He’s blaspheming? Who can forgive sins but God alone?”

Why did the Jews believe that only God can forgive sins? It can be explained like this: A sin is an offense which is committed against God. An offense can only be forgiven by the person against whom it is committed. Therefore a sin can only be forgiven by God. since sinning is the action which sparates us from God (Romans 3:23), and God is the only one who can forgive sins, we must conclude that it can only take an action of God to bridge this gulf between each one of us and God. If it was some mere man or angel who was crucified what would that prove? It would show that God was unjust, making a third party suffer for a two party transaction. But God is not unjust and thus we must conclude that God took human form, to die, and to bridge the gap between human beings and himself.
Read the rest of this entry »


The Coming Evangelical Collapse – A Statistical Support – Part 2.

Mar 17, 2009

surveyBy Michael Bell

As I was time limited when taking my first statistical look at “The Coming Evangelical Collapse“, I wanted to follow up with a few more observations about some of Michael Spencer’s statements:

1. Denominations will shrink, even vanish.

Much to my surprise, the decline in evangelicals in the U.S. has already begun. The Association of Religious Data Archives (ARDA) lets you generate maps to visibly see the changes. The maps shown here show the difference in Evangelicals between 1990 and 2000.  Note how the colors have lightened over 10 years, particularly in the south-east.

U.S. Evangelicals 1990
U.S. Evangelicals 2000

You can visit the ARDA site to create your own maps on a national, regional, and/or denominational level.

When we look at the age composition of churches in the data from the American Religious Identity Survey (ARIS), it is clear that those who will be impacted the most will be those denominations who call themselves Baptist. The most significant growth is coming from those Christians who say they have no denominational affiliation. Two thirds of these are under the age of fifty. It is clear from the data that there is and will be a move away from denominational identification.

2. Fewer and fewer evangelical churches will survive and thrive.
Read the rest of this entry »


The Coming Evangelical Collapse – An anecdotal look at Canada

Mar 13, 2009

surveyBy Michael Bell

A number of commentators have called me to account for not providing proper support for my last point.

Michael Spencer had written:

This collapse will herald the arrival of an anti-Christian chapter of the post-Christian West. Intolerance of Christianity will rise to levels many of us have not believed possible in our lifetimes, and public policy will become hostile toward evangelical Christianity, seeing it as the opponent of the common good.

I responded by saying that:

If you want to know what America is going to look like in forty years, and how Evangelicals will be treated, look at Canada today… If my statistical analysis up to this point has been correct, then Evangelical numbers in the USA in forty years will be very similar to Evangelical numbers in Canada today. Much of what Michael has said about the way Evangelicals will be treated in the USA is already true in Canada… I do not have the time or space to go into further details, but forty years from now it will be a much different world from what you are currently experiencing.

My mistake was not going into details. I was not trying to say that Canada is a scary place. I was just trying to say that it will be different. Keep in mind that I am saying this as one who is engaging the culture. My kids all go to Public School in Canada, I served for a number of years on School Council. My kids all play soccer in the public league, even though there is a faith based league that they could belong to. I am the lone Evangelical Christian at an advertising agency which has about as secular a culture as you can get.

So here are some of the things that I have experienced or seen happen in Canada that shows society’s increasing intolerance towards Christianity:

Read the rest of this entry »


In defense of iMonk and the coming Evangelical collapse

Mar 13, 2009

surveyBy Michael Bell.

Michael Spencer has published a series of articles about a coming Evangelical collapse in the United States. One, published in the Christian Science Monitor, has stirred up a great deal of debate, both inside and outside the Christian community. As a person who is greatly interested in statistics, I was very interested in seeing if Michael’s claims could be borne out by statistical analysis. Let’s look at some of his statements and see if these ideas can be statistically supported.

1. “Between 25 and 35 percent of Americans today are Evangelicals.”

Let start by looking at the present day numbers. Michael says that between 25 and 35 percent of Americans today are Evangelical. According to the recently released American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS), of the 228,182,000 adult Americans in the survey, 77,747,000 self identify as “Evangelical” or “Born Again”, a number equivalent to 34% of the adult population. These numbers come from across the theological spectrum and include a significant percentage (18.4%) of Catholics who identify themselves as Evangelical as well as members (38.6%) of mainline denominations. So when Michael says that a maximum of 35% of Americans are Evangelical, he is pretty much on the money.

If you only want to count those Evangelicals who are not attending Catholic or mainline denominations you have a number of 56,500,000 who identify as Evangelical or “Born Again”, a number equal to 24.8% of the total adult population. So it would appear that Michael’s range of 25-35% was an extremely accurate starting point.

2. “Within two generations, evangelicalism will be a house deserted of half its occupants.”

Read the rest of this entry »


Welcome visitors from Internet Monk

Mar 12, 2009

By Michael Bell

We are getting a fair number of visitors because of our post on Internet Monk supporting his claims for an Evangelical collapse. Welcome, take some time to browse and enjoy the site. Be sure to check our Archived Series for some of the more interesting posts that we have written. Any feedback you might provide by way of comments is always appreciated.

In many ways it is kind of ironic, that we would be writing about an Evangelical collapse as Eclectic Christian is about the centrality of the Gospel, and celebrating the many good things that are happening in Churches of many different stripes. Although this may sound strange, I see the post by Michael Spencer as a good thing too. Not because it contains good news, but because it is a clarion call to action. If the good news of Jesus Christ is to be proclaimed, then Evangelicals must act as evangelicals. What are we doing to help spread the good news in a way that people can hear it, understand it, and respond?

Romans 1:16a – For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is God’s power for the salvation of everyone who believes.

Your thoughts and comments are always welcome.


Reflections on the Deity of Christ – The Name of God

Mar 6, 2009
Christ on the throne

Christ on the throne

By Michael Bell

This is Part 10, of a multi-part series looking at the deity of Christ. Here are the links to the Introduction and Table of Contents.

In Judaism, someone’s name carries much more significance than it does in Western thought. For example an introduction to Judaism tells us that:

In Jewish thought, a name is not merely an arbitrary designation, a random combination of sounds. The name conveys the nature and essence of the thing named. It represents the history and reputation of the being named.

This is not as strange or unfamiliar a concept as it may seem at first glance. In English, we often refer to a person’s reputation as his “good name.” When a company is sold, one thing that may be sold is the company’s “good will,” that is, the right to use the company’s name. The Hebrew concept of a name is very similar to these ideas.

An example of this usage occurs in Ex. 3:13-22: Moses asks God what His “name” is. Moses is not asking “what should I call you;” rather, he is asking “who are you; what are you like; what have you done.” That is clear from God’s response. God replies that He is eternal, that He is the God of our ancestors, that He has seen our affliction and will redeem us from bondage…

Because a name represents the reputation of the thing named, a name should be treated with the same respect as the thing’s reputation. For this reason, God’s Names, in all of their forms, are treated with enormous respect and reverence in Judaism.

We should then understand that what the Bible says about the name of Jesus is something that we should pay very close attention to, as it is something that the audience of the day would have paid very close attention to as well. Let us first look at what Paul had to say:

Philippians 2:9 (NIV) – “Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name.”

What is the highest place, and what is the name above every name? If it is the place of God and the name of God, does this mean that God the Father is restoring to Christ to the equality that he had with the Father before the incarnation? This seems to be the case as the equality we see in verse 9 parallels the equality we see in verse 6. The idea that Christ has received God name is in fact stated by Christ himself.

John 17:11 (NIV) – “…Holy Father, protect them by the power of your name – the name you have me – so that they may be one as we are one.”

As discussed earlier, this concept of Christ sharing God’s name is not merely a symbolic thing, but one that shows that Christ has God’s attributes, his eternity and his power.

As discussed in a previous post that is why it is at the name of Jesus that every knee will bow and tongue confess, just as it will bow and confess to God.

There is another very significant scripture that speaks of God’s name being shared by both Father and Son which we should not overlook.

Matthew 28:29 (NIV) – “Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”

Notice how the verse uses “name” and not “names”. Matthew, writing primarily to a Jewish audience, would have been the one most likely to realize the significance of what Jesus was saying. If the original quotation was about three completely different beings, he would have said either “the names of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” or “the name of the Father and the name of the Son and the name of the Holy Spirit.” The fact that neither of the these two options were chosen, was not as a result of bad grammar, but that Matthew recognized that Christ was referring to one name of one being revealed in three persons. The name above every name is God (in Hebrew Yahweh or Jehovah), and this name is shared by Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Thus Christianity talks of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, not three distinct entities, but one!

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome.


TTSTM – March 4 – Adrian and Natalia of Nicomedia

Mar 6, 2009

This post is the daily post for March 4th on my blog: Telling the Stories that Matter.

Adrian was a loyal soldier in the Herculean legion under emperor Maximian. The Herculean legion was one of the two veteran legions promoted to the role of Imperial Guard as emperors became increasingly uncomfortable with the loyalty of the Praetorian guard. To be a member of this legion was a great honor that came with a significant number of obligations and responsibilities. One particular role that members of the Herculean legion served was that of torturer of those who dared to resist the Empire. In this way, they were soldiers that fought not only for territory and control but also the minds of the people the emperor hoped to rule over. In the early fourth century, Christians were a common target for the emperor’s wrath and members of the Herculean guard were therefore called upon to torture and kill Christians with regularity.

Once when Adrian was torturing a group of Christians he was stunned with their peace of mind in the face of great pain. As the soldiers he was commanding burned the Christians with hot pokers and beat them savagely, he looked on and had time to marvel at the love and forgiveness they offered their torturers. In Adrian’s mind he must have wondered if he could remain so loyal to the Empire if asked to suffer to this degree for it. As they were being tortured he asked them “What kind of reward could you possibly be expecting from your God that makes you so willing to remain loyal even in the face of Rome’s worst tortures?” The Christians looked at each other through their pain and Adrian must have considered that he had finally stumped them or broken their will.

But then they quoted Paul’s first letter to the Church in Corinth and responded, “For those that love God, God has prepared something that no eye has ever seen, no ear has ever heard, and no human has ever even begun to conceive.” The room was filled with a stunned silence that can only rightfully accompany a sudden and unexpected glimpse of profound and hope filled truth. The soldiers turned to see how Adrian would respond–perhaps they were hoping he would dispel the conviction that tickled their hearts and respond with some witty or equally profound statement to support the Imperial lie they were suddenly aware they were a part of. Adrian responded by dropping to his knees and begging the prayers and forgiveness of the Christians. The soldiers were shocked at this but were further amazed when he proclaimed his faith and trust in the Lord of the Christians whom he had just been persecuting. The men he had been commanding arrested him and turned him over to the brutal hands of the Emperor. He was thrown in prison to await the day he would be executed for his crime of faith.

While in prison his wife, Natalia, heard the story of what had happened to him but wanted to hear it for herself. So, she disguised herself and dressed as a young boy so that she might be admitted to see him in prison. When she arrived, she revealed her identity to her husband and asked him to tell her what had happened. He told the story of the birth of faith within him and she was likewise convicted by the words of the Christians and the faith that had gripped her husband whom she trusted. She, too, was converted and asked that he pray for her once he had attained that glorious reward that now loomed before him a little closer every day. The very next day he was paraded before members of the Herculean legion and Natalia and had his limbs first broken on an anvil and then amputated brutally. As he lie bleeding in Natalia’s arms, they decapitated him and took what remained of his body away from Natalia and to a great fire to be burned along with the bodies of the Christians he had been torturing just two days previous. As they cast the bodies into the flames, Natalia let out a great cry and rushed to throw herself onto the pyre but a great storm that had been building suddenly issued both wind and rain and the fire was put out before Natalia or the bodies could be burned.

A little while later–and under the cover of darkness–Christians came out of hiding to take the bodies of the martyrs and give them a Christian burial. Along with the bodies, they took Natalia with them and cared for her for the rest of her life. She was the widow of a martyr and a Christian herself and so she was honored among the Christians for years to come. Though she was not a martyr herself it was clear that she had given up much for her faith. So, when she died she was buried alongside Adrian in the place where martyrs were buried.


Status Update

Mar 6, 2009

Burlington House

Burlington House



By Mike Bell

An inquiring reader emailed me to ask why I hadn’t been posting very regularly recently. Well, I have just bought me a house. Not a regular house, mind you, but one that hadn’t been updated in over 50 years. So, over the next six months or so, I am going to be tad busy renovating. I will still keep writing for Eclectic Christian, but my posts will be a little more infrequent. I must also say that I am eternally grateful to Joshua Hearne for the wonderful contribution that he has been making to the site. If anyone else wants to do an occasional guest post, drop me a note. You can reach me at mike_kim_bell[at]hotmail[dot]com.

The picture is of the house next door. Same age, but it has been fixed up. Think of it as our “after” picture.


Save $50 – $100 a year on gasoline

Feb 26, 2009

By Michael Bell

Ok, so this is not my most theological post ever, but one that should save our readers a lot of money. (Particularly the Canadians.)

A Canadian Member of Parliament (American’s think the equivalent of Congressman), Dan McTeague, has a formula which he uses to calculate Gas Prices in Canada. He does this based on the spot price of Gasoline on the New York Mercantile Exchange. He then applies a formula to the price, and presto, he gets the price of Gasoline for each major Canadian city. (Don’t worry we have good news for Americans too!) The neat thing about it, is at roughly 5:00 p.m. EST, he posts what the price of Gasoline is going to be THE NEXT DAY.

Read the rest of this entry »


TTSTM – Janani Jakaliya Luwum, Martyr, Priest, Enemy of Idi Amin

Feb 26, 2009

Each month I post one of my favorite stories from my blog Telling the Stories that Matter. This story was originally posted on February 16.

Janani Jakaliya Luwum knew that he carried only a letter and no weapons but he was aware that the actions he was setting himself about would carry violent repercussions. As Archbishop of the Anglican church in Uganda, he knew that critical words could very well result in his own death at the hands of the man whom his letter addressed: Idi Amin. Yet, he was gripped with a faith that said it would be better to suffer while speaking truth to the dangerous and powerful than it would be to poison his soul and mind by stifling the movement of the Holy Spirit. He had converted to Christianity when he was approximately twenty-six years old and had gone on to ministerial training the following year. Janani had taken vows before God and the Church that he would not shirk his duties as a shepherd and priest and in doing so he might have been signing his own death warrant. He was ordained a priest in 1954 and Amin came to power in 1971. Yet, Amin’s power could not deter Janani. So, he wrote a letter and personally delivered it to Idi Amin. The letter was a group effort of clerical leaders in Uganda protesting Amin’s way of keeping power and control through the easy distribution of military death to those who stood in his way. For bringing yet more attention to these deaths and dissappearances–and especially for the letter–Janani was arrested and charged with treason.

It was January 16, 1977, when Janani was arrested along with two other cabinet ministers. Idi Amin and his henchmen immediately went to work spreading slander and lies about Janani’s politics and offenses. He was labeled a traitor and paraded before a crowd. As he and a large audience looked on, other men were brought onto a stage who confessed to knowing about and participating in illegal activities with Janani and his companions. Idi Amin insisted to all who would listen that Janani had been trying to initiate a coup against him and was intent on violent insurrection. The men who had confessed had never met Janani but Idi Amin had used them to implicate the Janani and his companions. The “confessors” were freed for they had done their part and there was never any intention to punish them–they were merely there to win the crowd’s approval. After the supposed “confessions” were heard, Janani and the men were put into a car to be transferred to an interrogation center. The next day, it was reported that they had crashed on their way to the interrogation center and all three had died from their injuries.

Yet, when they found the bodies and prepared them for burial they noticed that Janani had been shot mulitiple times are relatively close range. He had been shot once with a pistol in his mouth and three times in the chest. The story leaked out that they had been transferred to a military base where they were beaten, tortured, threatened, and finally shot to death. Idi Amin himself pulled the trigger that stole the life of Janani. He died a martyr because he refused to compromise the truth and he would not be frightened by the threats of those in power. For this offense, he died. By this offense, he proclaimed life deeper and more real than any that the world’s powers could offer.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.